30 research outputs found

    The genetic basis for adaptation of model-designed syntrophic co-cultures.

    Get PDF
    Understanding the fundamental characteristics of microbial communities could have far reaching implications for human health and applied biotechnology. Despite this, much is still unknown regarding the genetic basis and evolutionary strategies underlying the formation of viable synthetic communities. By pairing auxotrophic mutants in co-culture, it has been demonstrated that viable nascent E. coli communities can be established where the mutant strains are metabolically coupled. A novel algorithm, OptAux, was constructed to design 61 unique multi-knockout E. coli auxotrophic strains that require significant metabolite uptake to grow. These predicted knockouts included a diverse set of novel non-specific auxotrophs that result from inhibition of major biosynthetic subsystems. Three OptAux predicted non-specific auxotrophic strains-with diverse metabolic deficiencies-were co-cultured with an L-histidine auxotroph and optimized via adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE). Time-course sequencing revealed the genetic changes employed by each strain to achieve higher community growth rates and provided insight into mechanisms for adapting to the syntrophic niche. A community model of metabolism and gene expression was utilized to predict the relative community composition and fundamental characteristics of the evolved communities. This work presents new insight into the genetic strategies underlying viable nascent community formation and a cutting-edge computational method to elucidate metabolic changes that empower the creation of cooperative communities

    Reframing gene essentiality in terms of adaptive flexibility

    Get PDF
    Abstract Background Essentiality assays are important tools commonly utilized for the discovery of gene functions. Growth/no growth screens of single gene knockout strain collections are also often utilized to test the predictive power of genome-scale models. False positive predictions occur when computational analysis predicts a gene to be non-essential, however experimental screens deem the gene to be essential. One explanation for this inconsistency is that the model contains the wrong information, possibly an incorrectly annotated alternative pathway or isozyme reaction. Inconsistencies could also be attributed to experimental limitations, such as growth tests with arbitrary time cut-offs. The focus of this study was to resolve such inconsistencies to better understand isozyme activities and gene essentiality. Results In this study, we explored the definition of conditional essentiality from a phenotypic and genomic perspective. Gene-deletion strains associated with false positive predictions of gene essentiality on defined minimal medium for Escherichia coli were targeted for extended growth tests followed by population sequencing and transcriptome analysis. Of the twenty false positive strains available and confirmed from the Keio single gene knock-out collection, 11 strains were shown to grow with longer incubation periods making these actual true positives. These strains grew reproducibly with a diverse range of growth phenotypes. The lag phase observed for these strains ranged from less than one day to more than 7 days. It was found that 9 out of 11 of the false positive strains that grew acquired mutations in at least one replicate experiment and the types of mutations ranged from SNPs and small indels associated with regulatory or metabolic elements to large regions of genome duplication. Comparison of the detected adaptive mutations, modeling predictions of alternate pathways and isozymes, and transcriptome analysis of KO strains suggested agreement for the observed growth phenotype for 6 out of the 9 cases where mutations were observed. Conclusions Longer-term growth experiments followed by whole genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis can provide a better understanding of conditional gene essentiality and mechanisms of adaptation to such perturbations. Compensatory mutations are largely reproducible mechanisms and are in agreement with genome-scale modeling predictions to loss of function gene deletion events

    Ἕνα πρόσταγμα τοῦ Ματθαίου Καντακουζηνοῦ (4 Δεκεμβρίου 1353)

    No full text
    <p> </p><p> </p><p>N. Oikonomidès</p><p>Un prostagma de Matthieu Cantacuzène (4 décembre 1353) </p><p>Un prostagma impérial, conservé aux archives de la Grande Lavra (Dölger, Facsimiles, n° 53 = Actes de Lavra III, n° 166, cf. n° 133 bis) et concernant certains biens du couvent situés à Ainos et à Kissos, porte la date 4 décembre, indiction 7; son auteur se réfère à des privilèges plus anciens, accordés à Lavra par deux empereurs défunts, son grand père et son oncle. Il est ici proposé que ce postagma doit être attribué à Matthieu Cantacuzène et daté du 4 décembre 1353 pour les raisons suivantes: a) Compte tenu de la politique dynastique de Jean VI Cantacuzène, Matthieu pouvait bien se référer, en 1353, à un ";;;grand père";;; (Michel IX) et à un ";;;oncle";;; (Andronic III), tous deux morts avant cette date, b) Le ménologe de notre prostagma est différent de ceux de tous les autres empereurs des XIVe et XVe s. c) Le prostagma a dû être émis à un moment où Ainos et Kissos se trouvaient sous domination byzantine; or, Ainos fut cédée à Niccolo Gattilusi avant 1382 (probablement entre 1376 et 1379) et Kissos fut définitivement conquis par les Turcs avant 1389; le prostagma doit donc dater avant 1382 - période pendant laquelle le seul empereur byzantin qui pouvait parler d'un oncle à lui qui aurait régné et qui serait déjà décédé est Matthieu Cantacuzène. d) En décembre 1353, Matthieu Cantacuzène avait déjà été acclamé empereur; avec son père et coempereur Jean VI, il contrôlait la région d'Ainos et de Kissos; cette situation expliquerait pourquoi les moines lui auraient demandé la confirmation de leurs privilèges.</p
    corecore